NTSB: I-35W Gusset Failure Could Have Been 'Catastrophic'

QUESTION:

The only thing I can think of is that whatever equipment was up there was concentrated enough in one area that it caused too much stress in that area, causing the failure. The failure of whatever in that small area means bridge falls down.

I'm curious if they've gone ahead and put up any sort of permanent signing besides the occasoinal 35W-Detour signs on 280? Have they put anything on the overhead BGS, or are they still relying on the variable boards planted on the side of the road?

ANSWER:

Actually, passenger vehicles are never used to design loading; heavy trucks are the design vehicle for structures, and each one is assumed to weigh the maximum allowed amount. Back when this bridge was designed it was lower than the current allowed amount, though, which is now 80,000 pounds.

I would be surprised if they determine that the construction equipment was the sole cause of this collapse. It's still my opinion that the lack of adequate inspection and maintenance caused the structure to deteriorate to the point where the loading (vehicles or construction), caused the collapse. Had it been maintained properly the construction loading would not have done anything.


Google

Submit your comment or answer




Privacy Policy